A valid relationship
They must explain how long and in what capacity they have known you, and when regular contact last occurred.
Test one proposed academic or professional referee against the relationship, first-hand evidence, authorship and language issues that matter. Then compare a second person before you decide.
Free quick suitability check
No login, names or personal story required. Answers are evaluated in this browser and are not a prediction of selection.
They must explain how long and in what capacity they have known you, and when regular contact last occurred.
Specific observations about leadership, relationship-building, personal qualities and academic ability are more useful than praise.
You may share accurate reminders, but the referee—not the applicant—must write the reference.
Chevening permits professional or academic referees, and its guidance also refers to people who know you in a professional or personal capacity. A referee must not be a friend or relative and needs a credible basis for commenting on you.
Yes. A referee does not need to be your current employer. What matters is the relationship, when regular contact occurred, and whether the person can provide relevant first-hand evidence.
Yes. Chevening says you may use two professional referees, two academic referees, or one of each.
No. Chevening states that applicants must not write their own reference. You may organise accurate factual reminders, but the referee must author the reference independently.
No. Current Chevening references guidance says letterhead and a handwritten signature are not required.
No. It is an independent educational check based on current public guidance. Follow the instructions in your own application and verify any updated rules on the official Chevening website.
This independent CheveningPrep tool was checked against Chevening's public references guidance on 13 July 2026. It cannot approve a referee or predict a scholarship decision. Requirements and submission instructions can change.